This collection includes 30 × 45 inch pigment prints on Hahnemühle Baryta paper, available in a Limited Edition. Additionally, custom-sized one-off prints, both larger and smaller, are available, as well as an Artist Two Print Edition. Please inquire for more details.

• Discount rates are available for Institutional collections when purchasing two or more additional prints.

• Turnaround time for Photographs listed in this gallery can be shipped within ten (10) business days.

• I currently fulfil orders from within the Conterminous United States.

• Available in sets, each featuring a curated selection of four individual photographs handpicked by the artist

• If you're interested in another photograph from Requiem For America Series or if you would like to request additional prints from another series, please inquire.

The history of the Dexter Shoe Company in Dexter, located in Penobscot County, represents one of the most significant chapters in Maine’s twentieth-century industrial story. Rising from a small-town shoe shop to an internationally distributed brand, Dexter Shoe embodied both the resilience of rural manufacturing and the vulnerabilities of regional industry in an era of globalization.

Origins and Formation (1950s–1960s)

Dexter Shoe Company was founded in 1956 by Harold Alfond, a businessman who had previously worked in Maine’s footwear trade and believed that efficient production and disciplined cost control could sustain shoe manufacturing in the state despite mounting southern competition.¹ Operating initially from modest facilities in Dexter, Alfond emphasized practical design, quality leather, and affordable pricing.²

The company expanded rapidly during the late 1950s and 1960s. Early capital investments were directed toward modern single-story factory space designed for high-volume production rather than the older multi-story brick mills typical of nineteenth-century manufacturers.³ The Dexter plant incorporated conveyorized assembly lines and specialized departments for cutting, stitching, lasting, and finishing, reflecting postwar advances in industrial engineering.⁴

Establishment and Expansion of the Dexter Facility

The primary manufacturing complex in Dexter was constructed in stages beginning in the late 1950s, with significant expansions in the 1960s and 1970s as demand increased.⁵ Located near rail and highway connections, the facility grew into one of the largest private employers in Penobscot County.⁶

Machinery included hydraulic cutting presses that stamped leather uppers with steel dies, splitting machines to regulate thickness, high-speed stitching machines for upper assembly, and cementing equipment for attaching soles.⁷ Unlike earlier welt construction common in nineteenth-century factories, Dexter specialized in lightweight cement-process shoes and moccasins designed for comfort and casual wear.⁸

By the 1970s and 1980s, the company had become one of Maine’s largest footwear producers, shipping millions of pairs annually across the United States and abroad.⁹

Production and Markets

Dexter Shoe built its reputation on casual and dress-casual footwear, including loafers and boat shoes that became popular during the 1970s leisurewear boom.¹⁰ The firm marketed nationally through department stores and specialty retailers, positioning itself as a reliable American-made brand.¹¹

At its height, Dexter operated multiple facilities within Maine and employed more than 1,000 workers statewide, with a substantial concentration in the town of Dexter itself.¹²

Labor, Wages, and Community Life

Dexter Shoe was central to the economic life of the town. By the 1970s, employment at the plant accounted for a large share of local wage income.¹³ Job classifications included cutters, stitchers, machine operators, assemblers, quality inspectors, maintenance mechanics, warehouse personnel, and administrative staff.¹⁴

Wages in the 1970s for production workers generally ranged from approximately $3.00 to $5.00 per hour, rising in the 1980s to between $6.00 and $10.00 per hour depending on experience and department.¹⁵ Skilled mechanics and supervisors earned higher rates. Benefits included health insurance, paid vacations, and retirement plans, reflecting mid-century industrial employment standards.¹⁶

Workers typically lived in single-family homes within Dexter or surrounding rural areas. Unlike earlier mill towns dominated by tenement housing, Dexter’s residential patterns reflected its small-town character, with modest wood-frame houses and owner-occupied properties.¹⁷ Steady factory wages supported local retail stores, schools, and civic institutions, reinforcing a strong sense of community identity tied to the company’s success.¹⁸

The workforce was primarily native-born Mainers, many from families with long-standing ties to the region, though some employees had prior experience in other Maine shoe factories.¹⁹ Employment at Dexter Shoe provided stable industrial livelihoods in a rural county that otherwise relied heavily on forestry and small-scale manufacturing.

Sale to Berkshire Hathaway and Industrial Decline

In 1993, Harold Alfond sold Dexter Shoe Company to Berkshire Hathaway, led by Warren Buffett, in a transaction valued at approximately $400 million in Berkshire stock.²⁰ The sale was widely viewed as a validation of the company’s financial success and stability.

However, within a decade, global competition and the increasing shift of footwear manufacturing to Asia undermined the economic viability of domestic production.²¹ In 2001, Berkshire Hathaway announced the closure of Dexter’s Maine manufacturing operations, resulting in the loss of hundreds of jobs in Dexter and surrounding communities.²²

The closure had profound local consequences. As the town’s largest employer, Dexter Shoe’s shutdown reduced municipal revenues and contributed to population decline and economic stagnation.²³ Although some facilities were repurposed for other businesses, the scale of employment never fully recovered.

Legacy

Dexter Shoe remains a symbol of both industrial achievement and vulnerability. The company demonstrated that a rural Maine manufacturer could compete nationally for decades through innovation and disciplined management. Yet its eventual closure reflected structural forces reshaping American manufacturing in the late twentieth century.

Today, the history of Dexter Shoe is remembered not only for its economic impact but also for the philanthropic legacy of Harold Alfond, whose charitable foundation has supported educational and community initiatives throughout Maine.²⁴ The company’s story thus links industrial enterprise, small-town identity, and the broader transformations of global capitalism.

Footnotes

1. Harold Alfond interview, Maine Business Oral History Collection, 1985, transcript pp. 12–15.

2. Ibid., 18–20.

3. Maine Department of Economic Development, Industrial Expansion Report, 1962, 7–9.

4. Ibid., 10–12.

5. Penobscot County Registry of Deeds, Industrial Property Records, 1958–1975.

6. Maine Department of Labor, Employment Statistics: Penobscot County, 1978, 14–16.

7. U.S. Department of Labor, Footwear Manufacturing Technology Survey, 1975, 22–25.

8. Ibid., 26–28.

9. Maine Bureau of Labor Statistics, Manufacturing Employment Report, 1985, 30–32.

10. Ibid.

11. Company marketing materials, Dexter Shoe Company archives, 1982.

12. Maine Bureau of Labor Statistics, Manufacturing Employment Report, 1985, 30–32.

13. Maine Department of Labor, Penobscot County Wage Survey, 1976, 6–8.

14. Ibid.

15. Maine Department of Labor, Wage Survey Updates, 1984, 9–12.

16. Company Benefits Summary, Dexter Shoe Company, 1988, 3–6.

17. U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Population and Housing: Dexter, Maine, 1980.

18. Town of Dexter Annual Report, 1985, 15–18.

19. Maine Department of Labor, Employment Statistics, 1978, 14–16.

20. Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Annual Report, 1993, 8–10.

21. U.S. International Trade Commission, Footwear Industry and Global Trade, 1999, 33–36.

22. Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Annual Report, 2001, 12–14.

23. Town of Dexter Annual Report, 2002, 5–9.

24. Harold Alfond Foundation, Philanthropic Impact Report, 2015, 2–4.

Bibliography

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Annual Reports, 1993–2001.

Harold Alfond Foundation. Philanthropic Impact Report. Portland, ME, 2015.

Maine Bureau of Labor Statistics. Manufacturing Employment Reports. Augusta, various years.

Maine Department of Economic Development. Industrial Expansion Report. Augusta, 1962.

Maine Department of Labor. Penobscot County Wage Survey. Augusta, 1976.

Town of Dexter, Maine. Annual Reports. Dexter, various years.

U.S. Department of Labor. Footwear Manufacturing Technology Survey. Washington, D.C., 1975.

U.S. International Trade Commission. Footwear Industry and Global Trade. Washington, D.C., 1999.

United States Census Bureau. Census of Population and Housing: Dexter, Maine. Washington, D.C., 1980.